Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — substantive hearing
MPTS tribunal suspends GP Dr Syed Ghias for a month over assault conviction and reporting failure
A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service panel has suspended GP Dr Syed Sajid Ghias for one month, finding his fitness to practise impaired by his conviction for assaulting a 14-year-old boy in a street altercation and his failure to notify the GMC of the charge and conviction.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 22 May 2026 · Updated 8 July 2026
Suspension (suspended from practice) — 1 month
Added to MedicWatch: 8 July 2026Report a correction
What does “suspended from practice” mean?
A suspension is a fixed-term pause on the right to practise. The practitioner cannot work in the regulated profession during the suspension. At the end of the period the suspension may be extended, replaced with another sanction, or lifted on review.
Concerning Syed Sajid Ghias, doctor (General Medical Council 6099644).
Decision date: 22 May 2026 · Hearing started 18 May 2026 and ended 22 May 2026
This sanction period has elapsed.
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr Ghias's fitness to practise is impaired by reason of a criminal conviction and misconduct. In 2025 he was convicted and fined for assaulting a 14-year-old boy during a street altercation, and he failed to notify the GMC of the charge and conviction without delay. The tribunal accepted his insight and remediation were genuine, that the incident was out of character and that the risk of repetition was low, but concluded a sanction was needed to maintain public confidence. It suspended his registration for one month, with no review required.
Charges
Dr Ghias admitted, and the Tribunal found proved, that on 29 January 2025 at Loughborough Magistrates' Court he was convicted of assaulting Mr A, a 14-year-old boy, by beating, contrary to section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, and was fined £2,019 with £50 compensation and an £808 victim surcharge. The conviction arose from an altercation on 12 April 2024 on a footpath, when, after a verbal exchange with the cyclist, Dr Ghias pulled Mr A and punched him before a bystander intervened. Dr Ghias also admitted that he failed to notify the GMC without delay that he had been charged with, and convicted of, the offence. The Tribunal found the conviction engaged a legal basis for impairment and that the reporting failure amounted to serious misconduct.
Findings
The Tribunal found Dr Ghias's fitness to practise impaired by reason of both his conviction and misconduct. It placed the conviction in the mid-range of the spectrum of seriousness, noting the violence was a one-off, short-lived loss of control outside his clinical role that caused no significant injury, but that it was directed at a minor in front of children. It accepted his insight was genuine and that he had remediated through anger-management and conflict-resolution CPD, coaching, remorse and apology, assessing the risk of repetition as low and finding no concerns about his clinical practice. It found the failure to notify the GMC a genuine but unreasonable and serious mistake at the lower end of seriousness. The Tribunal concluded that, although patient safety was not engaged, a finding of impairment was needed to maintain public confidence and uphold professional standards. It imposed a one-month suspension, declined to order conditions or erasure, and directed that no review was necessary.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.