Dental regulator insights

Why UK dentists are struck off

This analysis groups published dental erasure determinations into broad reason categories using the regulator-described charges, findings, and summaries indexed by MedicWatch. The figures describe MedicWatch's indexed corpus of published regulator determinations, not all healthcare misconduct.

105

published erasure determinations analysed

104

matched at least one specific reason category

12 March 2018

earliest decision date in this view

4 September 2026

latest decision date in this view

Cite this: https://medicwatch.co.uk/insights/why-dentists-are-struck-off#dataset-summary · download the underlying data (CSV).

Interactive chart

Categorised reasons in published erasure decisions

Records

96 of 105

91.4%

Clinical care

9 of 105

8.6%

Dishonesty

8 of 105

7.6%

Patient safety

7 of 105

6.7%

Criminal conviction

5 of 105

4.8%

Workplace conduct

5 of 105

4.8%

Consent and dignity

3 of 105

2.9%

Health and substance

3 of 105

2.9%

Non-engagement

2 of 105

1.9%

Medicines and drugs

1 of 105

1%

Other

1 of 105

1%

Category table

CategoryCountShareWhat this includes
Records, paperwork, and administration9691.4%Findings involving record keeping, notes, paperwork, documentation, or administrative compliance.
Clinical care and competence98.6%Findings involving clinical care, treatment, diagnosis, competence, performance, or professional skill.
Dishonesty and false records87.6%Findings involving dishonesty, fraud, forged documents, false statements, or misleading records.
Patient safety and safeguarding76.7%Findings involving patient safety, safeguarding, vulnerable people, child protection, or risk of harm.
Criminal conviction or caution54.8%Findings where the published determination refers to a criminal conviction, caution, court sentence, or criminal offence.
Workplace conduct and colleagues54.8%Findings involving colleagues, workplace behaviour, bullying, harassment, or employer-related conduct.
Communication, consent, and dignity32.9%Findings involving consent, communication, dignity, confidentiality, or patient information.
Health, alcohol, or substance concerns32.9%Findings involving health concerns, alcohol, substance misuse, or health-related impairment.
Non-engagement with the regulator21.9%Findings involving failure to engage, non-compliance, breach of conditions, or failure to cooperate with the regulator.
Medicines, prescribing, and drugs11%Findings involving prescribing, medicines management, controlled drugs, medication errors, or drug misuse.
Other or unclear11%Determinations where the available summary text does not clearly match one of the other broad categories.

Example source-backed determinations

Records, paperwork, and administration

  • 7 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    William Gamba

    The GDC tribunal decided that William Gamba should be erased after findings of serious clinical failings, treating patients while suspended and failing to cooperate with its investigation. One allegation was not proved and another was withdrawn. The committee found current impairment and no evidence of remediation or insight. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period and any appeal, pending the erasure taking effect.

    Read the source determination

  • 6 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Martin Wells

    The GDC tribunal decided that dental nurse Martin Wells should be erased from the register. The Professional Conduct Committee made the order on 6 August 2026 and ordered that his registration be suspended immediately. The GDC records that the decision is within the appeal period. The published outcome summary for this hearing does not set out the charges or the committee's findings, and no full determination document was available on the hearing page at the time of publication.

    Read the source determination

  • 5 June 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    Colin Duncan McLauchlan

    The GDC tribunal decided that dentist Colin Duncan McLauchlan should be erased from the register with immediate suspension. The Professional Conduct Committee, sitting in his absence, found widespread failings in examinations, radiograph reporting, diagnosis and consent across 39 patients between 2018 and 2023, and found he acted dishonestly towards four patients, including denying he had left a dental bur in a patient's mouth and misattributing his own root canal work to another dentist.

    Read the source determination

Clinical care and competence

  • 7 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    William Gamba

    The GDC tribunal decided that William Gamba should be erased after findings of serious clinical failings, treating patients while suspended and failing to cooperate with its investigation. One allegation was not proved and another was withdrawn. The committee found current impairment and no evidence of remediation or insight. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period and any appeal, pending the erasure taking effect.

    Read the source determination

  • 30 July 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Andrea Strafford

    The GDC tribunal decided that dental nurse Andrea Strafford should be erased after finding that she dishonestly took approximately £240 from her employer and failed to cooperate with its investigation. The separate allegation that her conduct was misleading was not proved. The committee found a risk of repetition without evidence of insight or remediation. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period.

    Read the source determination

  • 24 June 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    Kacper Jakub Latos

    The GDC tribunal decided that dentist Kacper Jakub Latos should be erased from the dental register. On 24 June 2026, the Professional Conduct Committee found his fitness to practise impaired by misconduct, ruling that he provided a poor standard of care to a patient over three years, failed to obtain informed consent, permitted an unregistered former dentist to treat her, and did not cooperate with the GDC. The committee ordered erasure and imposed an immediate suspension covering the appeal period.

    Read the source determination

Dishonesty and false records

  • 4 September 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    João Miguel Rebola Costa

    Following a hearing ending on 4 September 2026, the GDC Professional Conduct Committee directed João Miguel Rebola Costa's erasure for misconduct involving two falsified employment references. Other employment-history and NHS-conditions allegations were dismissed or not proved. The Committee found impairment on public-interest grounds, not public-protection grounds. It imposed immediate suspension while erasure awaits the end of the appeal period or disposal of an appeal. It found that a lesser sanction would not maintain public confidence.

    Read the source determination

  • 26 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Lyndsey Michelle Trembath

    The GDC tribunal decided that Lyndsey Michelle Trembath's fitness to practise was impaired following assault matters and failures to notify the regulator. It ordered her removal from the register and immediate suspension during the appeal period. The committee found the notification failures misleading, but rejected the dishonesty allegations. Removal takes effect 28 days after the decision is formally served unless she appeals; immediate suspension continues during any appeal.

    Read the source determination

  • 7 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    William Gamba

    The GDC tribunal decided that William Gamba should be erased after findings of serious clinical failings, treating patients while suspended and failing to cooperate with its investigation. One allegation was not proved and another was withdrawn. The committee found current impairment and no evidence of remediation or insight. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period and any appeal, pending the erasure taking effect.

    Read the source determination

Patient safety and safeguarding

  • 26 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Lyndsey Michelle Trembath

    The GDC tribunal decided that Lyndsey Michelle Trembath's fitness to practise was impaired following assault matters and failures to notify the regulator. It ordered her removal from the register and immediate suspension during the appeal period. The committee found the notification failures misleading, but rejected the dishonesty allegations. Removal takes effect 28 days after the decision is formally served unless she appeals; immediate suspension continues during any appeal.

    Read the source determination

  • 7 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    William Gamba

    The GDC tribunal decided that William Gamba should be erased after findings of serious clinical failings, treating patients while suspended and failing to cooperate with its investigation. One allegation was not proved and another was withdrawn. The committee found current impairment and no evidence of remediation or insight. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period and any appeal, pending the erasure taking effect.

    Read the source determination

  • 24 June 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    Kacper Jakub Latos

    The GDC tribunal decided that dentist Kacper Jakub Latos should be erased from the dental register. On 24 June 2026, the Professional Conduct Committee found his fitness to practise impaired by misconduct, ruling that he provided a poor standard of care to a patient over three years, failed to obtain informed consent, permitted an unregistered former dentist to treat her, and did not cooperate with the GDC. The committee ordered erasure and imposed an immediate suspension covering the appeal period.

    Read the source determination

Criminal conviction or caution

  • 26 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Lyndsey Michelle Trembath

    The GDC tribunal decided that Lyndsey Michelle Trembath's fitness to practise was impaired following assault matters and failures to notify the regulator. It ordered her removal from the register and immediate suspension during the appeal period. The committee found the notification failures misleading, but rejected the dishonesty allegations. Removal takes effect 28 days after the decision is formally served unless she appeals; immediate suspension continues during any appeal.

    Read the source determination

  • 13 May 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Harpreet Kaur Kundola

    The GDC tribunal decided that dental nurse and orthodontic therapist Harpreet Kaur Kundola should be erased from the register. The Professional Conduct Committee found her fitness to practise impaired by her 2024 conviction at Leeds Crown Court for conspiring to pervert the course of public justice, for which she received a suspended prison sentence. The panel said her behaviour was fundamentally incompatible with continued registration and suspended her registration immediately pending the appeal period.

    Read the source determination

  • 13 December 2024Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDentist

    Mohsen Mobasseri

    The GDC committee published a Professional Conduct Committee decision for Mohsen Mobasseri. It directed erasure from the dental register. The public outcome summary states: On 13 December 2024 the Professional Conduct Committee made an order to erase Mr Mobasseri from the register and ordered that their registration be suspended immediately. On 10 January 2025 Mr Mobasseri appealed against the decision. On 14th November 2025, the High Court dismissed the registrant’s appeal and upheld the sanction of erasure. This took effect... The official DPHS page links to the full determination PDF for the committee's reasons.

    Read the source determination

Workplace conduct and colleagues

  • 26 August 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Lyndsey Michelle Trembath

    The GDC tribunal decided that Lyndsey Michelle Trembath's fitness to practise was impaired following assault matters and failures to notify the regulator. It ordered her removal from the register and immediate suspension during the appeal period. The committee found the notification failures misleading, but rejected the dishonesty allegations. Removal takes effect 28 days after the decision is formally served unless she appeals; immediate suspension continues during any appeal.

    Read the source determination

  • 30 July 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Andrea Strafford

    The GDC tribunal decided that dental nurse Andrea Strafford should be erased after finding that she dishonestly took approximately £240 from her employer and failed to cooperate with its investigation. The separate allegation that her conduct was misleading was not proved. The committee found a risk of repetition without evidence of insight or remediation. It imposed immediate suspension to cover the appeal period.

    Read the source determination

  • 2 June 2026Dental Professionals Hearings ServiceDental nurse

    Salama Begum

    The GDC tribunal decided that dental nurse Salama Begum should be erased from the register, with an immediate suspension order. The Professional Conduct Committee found she offered and provided tooth whitening services outside a dental nurse's scope of practice and without indemnity cover, putting patient safety at risk, and that she acted dishonestly by denying the work to her employer and falsely telling the GDC it had approved the service.

    Read the source determination

Methodology and limits

This page analyses published erasure and voluntary-erasure determinations in the MedicWatch indexed corpus. It does not claim to measure all misconduct in UK healthcare or every regulator decision ever made.

MedicWatch applies a fixed taxonomy to regulator-derived charges, findings, and plain-English summaries. A determination can match more than one category, so category percentages may add up to more than 100%. The denominator for each percentage on this page is 105 published determinations.

Categories describe broad themes in the regulator's published findings. They are not new allegations by MedicWatch. Follow the linked source determinations for the full wording and context.

For citation, describe this as “MedicWatch analysis of its indexed corpus of published UK healthcare regulator erasure determinations”. Do not describe it as a measure of all UK healthcare misconduct.

Choose what works for you. Your choices are remembered for 180 days and you can change them any time using Cookie settings.