MedicWatchAn independent record

Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — substantive hearing

NMC panel strikes off Glasgow nurse Prince Aneke over care failings at two homes

The Nursing and Midwifery Council's Fitness to Practise Committee has struck off Glasgow nurse Prince Chigozie Aneke, finding a pattern of misconduct across two care homes in 2023 that included an insulin error, medication mistakes and failures to monitor vulnerable residents.

MedicWatch editorial · Published 13 July 2026 · Updated 18 July 2026

Erasure (struck off the register)

Added to MedicWatch: 17 July 2026Report a correction

What does “struck off the register” mean?

Being struck off (the regulator calls this "erasure") removes the practitioner from the register. They are no longer permitted to practise this profession in the UK. Erasure can be reviewed after a minimum of five years, but is otherwise indefinite.

Concerning Prince Chigozie Aneke, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 19K0018O).

Decision date: 13 July 2026 · Hearing started 1 December 2025 and ended 13 July 2026

In plain English

The NMC's Fitness to Practise Committee found that Prince Chigozie Aneke's fitness to practise was impaired by misconduct and made a striking-off order. The panel found proved a series of failings at two care homes in 2023, including an insulin error, failures to monitor and escalate care of vulnerable residents, repeated medication dispensing errors and failures to work cooperatively with colleagues. It concluded he had shown extremely limited insight. An 18-month interim suspension order was also imposed.

Charges

While employed at Bonnyholm Care Nursing Home (May to July 2023) and Pinewood Nursing Home (August to December 2023), charges found proved included: incorrectly administering Humulin M3 insulin instead of Humulin 1 and not completing an incident form; failing to record, act on, escalate or hand over a resident's lack of urinary output; not conducting observations of residents as instructed by paramedics and the nurse in charge; not responding for around an hour to a colleague's request for assistance with a screaming resident; inappropriately requesting an ambulance to re-catheterise a resident; stating he would not administer PRN pain relief to an end-of-life resident unless she asked; administering Parkinson's medication directly into a resident's mouth and not ensuring the full dose was swallowed; failing to locate stocked medication; multiple dispensing errors in a single medication round; and failures to work cooperatively with colleagues, including shouting at a carer, refusing handovers to team leaders, leaving a shift early and refusing to assist in verifying a resident's death. Several charges were found not proved and two had no case to answer.

Findings

The panel found that the facts proved amounted to misconduct representing serious departures from the Code, with a pattern of unsafe clinical practice, failures to monitor vulnerable residents and escalate risks, and unprofessional communication that it considered attitudinal in nature. It concluded he had demonstrated extremely limited insight, had not taken meaningful steps to remedy the concerns, and was liable to repeat the misconduct, finding his fitness to practise impaired on both public protection and public interest grounds. The panel decided to make a striking-off order, directing the registrar to strike him off the register, together with an interim suspension order of 18 months.

Mitigating and aggravating factors

Mitigating factors

The registrant described some personal stresses (details private in the published determination).

Aggravating factors

Abuse of a position of trust; conduct which deliberately or recklessly puts people receiving care at risk of suffering harm; deliberate breaches of the Code; a pattern of misconduct over a period of time, namely seven months across two care homes; extremely limited insight; vulnerability of the people receiving care.

Source

All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.

Spot something incorrect?

If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.