Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — voluntary removal
NMC agrees nurse Corah B Mckenna's removal from register with competence allegations unproven
The Nursing and Midwifery Council has agreed an application from nurse Corah B Mckenna to be removed from its register. Allegations about her competence and behaviour towards colleagues had not been considered by case examiners, and none was found proved.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 28 April 2026 · Updated 11 July 2026
Voluntary erasure accepted (voluntary removal from the register)
Added to MedicWatch: 11 July 2026Report a correction
What does “voluntary removal from the register” mean?
The practitioner asked to be removed from the register and the regulator accepted the request. This may happen during or after a fitness-to-practise case.
Concerning Corah B Mckenna, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 99J1273O).
Decision date: 28 April 2026
In plain English
The NMC agreed to remove nurse Corah B Mckenna from its register at her own request. Concerns had been raised about her competence in areas including medication administration and record-keeping, and about her behaviour towards colleagues, but no allegation was found proved by any committee. The NMC's Assistant Registrar decided the allegations were not likely to result in a striking-off order and that removal best served the public interest.
Charges
It was alleged that the registrant lacked competence in medication administration, record-keeping, time management and communicating with colleagues, and that her behaviour towards colleagues was intimidating. She accepted administering controlled drugs without a second checker on one occasion and denied the other concerns. The concerns had not been considered by case examiners and no allegation was found substantively proved by a statutory committee.
Findings
An Assistant Registrar, under Rule 14 of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (Education, Registration and Registration Appeals) Rules 2004, agreed the application for removal from the register, satisfied that the registrant no longer intended to work as a registered nurse, that the allegations were not likely to result in a striking-off order, that no other good reasons required further consideration of the allegations, and that the public interest was best served by agreeing removal.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.