Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Dr Aung Tint, doctor (General Medical Council 4603483).
Decision date: 21 November 2025 · Hearing started 21 November 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal chair found at a paper review that Dr Tint's fitness to practise was no longer impaired following his earlier 12-month suspension for dishonesty. Dr Tint had worked for two NHS Trusts at the same time without disclosing this, and had been dishonest with his designated body about informing a Trust of his suspension. The chair found that Dr Tint had undertaken significant steps to remediate his conduct during the suspension period, including completing 78.5 hours of continuing professional development. The chair directed that Dr Tint's suspension be revoked immediately.
Charges
Dr Tint had previously been found to have worked remote sessions as a Consultant Psychiatrist for two different NHS Trusts concurrently between March 2020 and April 2021, receiving payment from both. He had also failed to declare the full scope of his practice during an NHS appraisal, failed to inform a Trust of his suspension by another designated body, and then dishonestly informed his designated body that he had done so.
Findings
At this paper review of his suspension, the MPTS chair found that Dr Tint's fitness to practise was no longer impaired. Dr Tint had undertaken significant remediation including CPD training, ethical reflection, and engagement with a mentor. The chair accepted that the risk of repetition was extremely low and directed that Dr Tint's 12-month suspension be revoked with immediate effect.
Mitigating and aggravating factors
Mitigating factors
Dr Tint demonstrated full cooperation with GMC proceedings, made admissions to the bulk of allegations, showed excellent insight and genuine remorse, took significant remediation steps during the suspension period including 78.5 hours of CPD, and demonstrated commitment to honest professional conduct.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.