MedicWatchAn independent record

Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — substantive hearing

NMC panel imposes conditions on nurse Lucyna Abramowicz over care home medication failings

The Nursing and Midwifery Council's Fitness to Practise Committee has placed a 12-month conditions of practice order on nurse Lucyna Abramowicz after finding she failed to give a care home resident's medication and recorded it as administered; dishonesty charges were not proved.

MedicWatch editorial · Published 22 June 2026 · Updated 8 July 2026

Conditions on practice (practising with restrictions) — 1 year

Added to MedicWatch: 8 July 2026Report a correction

What does “practising with restrictions” mean?

Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.

Concerning Lucyna Abramowicz, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 09A0007C).

Decision date: 22 June 2026 · Hearing started 16 June 2026 and ended 22 June 2026

In plain English

The NMC's Fitness to Practise Committee found that Lucyna Abramowicz, an adult nurse working at a care home in Ipswich, failed to administer a resident's medication, delegated it to a colleague who was not qualified to give it, and signed the MAR chart to say the medication had been given when it had not. Dishonesty charges were not proved. The panel found her fitness to practise impaired and imposed a 12-month conditions of practice order.

Charges

That, as a registered nurse, on 7 July 2022 she failed to administer medications to Resident A, inappropriately delegated the administration of medication for Resident A to a colleague who was not qualified to administer medication on their own, and inaccurately signed the MAR chart to state she had administered the medication when she had not; and on 14 July 2022 incorrectly recorded and/or presigned the MAR Chart Signature Check Chart as completed at 1900 hours when she had finished her shift at 1200 hours. Charges that she failed to supervise the administration and that her actions were dishonest were found not proved.

Findings

The panel found charges 1a, 1b, 1d and 3 proved and charges 1c, 2 and 4 not proved, including both dishonesty charges. It found the proved conduct on 7 July 2022 amounted to misconduct that put Resident A at risk of harm, while the 14 July 2022 record-keeping entry was a genuine error made while distressed and did not amount to misconduct. The panel found her fitness to practise impaired on public protection and public interest grounds, citing limited insight and no evidence of strengthened practice. It noted the NMC had sought a striking-off order on the basis of the unproved dishonesty allegations and determined that suspension or striking-off would be wholly disproportionate. It imposed a 12-month conditions of practice order with review, and an interim conditions of practice order for 12 months to cover any appeal period.

Mitigating and aggravating factors

Mitigating factors

Admissions at local level and to the NMC in the early stages of the investigation; possible work factors in a busy environment and lack of support at the Home (an element was recorded privately).

Aggravating factors

Lack of engagement with the Fitness to Practise process; limited insight.

Source

All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.

Spot something incorrect?

If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.