Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — substantive hearing
Interim restrictions imposed — 18 months
The regulator’s term: interim order imposed
What does “interim restrictions imposed” mean?
An interim order is a precautionary restriction imposed before the regulator's investigation is complete. It is not a finding of fault — the underlying allegations have not yet been adjudicated.
Concerning Mandy June Jilley, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 85Y3702E).
Decision date: 10 April 2026 · Hearing started 11 November 2025 and ended 10 April 2026
In plain English
The NMC found that Mandy Jilley, a registered nurse, did not properly record a patient restraint incident at Uplands Hospital in May 2019, and at Kitnocks Nursing Home in late 2019 failed to assess a deteriorating patient, did not call an ambulance when needed, gave dishonest answers in the investigation, and gave a patient antipsychotic medication at the wrong times. The panel decided her fitness to practise is impaired. The hearing has paused before deciding sanction, and an 18-month interim suspension order is in place.
Charges
That, while a registered nurse: (1) at Uplands Hospital, did not provide sufficient detail in Patient A's notes regarding a restraint incident on 13 May 2019, and did not state that a follow-up entry was made retrospectively; (2) at Kitnocks Nursing Home, between 15-20 December 2019 did not take appropriate action to treat Patient B's grade 2 pressure sore, on 21 December 2019 did not update the NEWS2 chart or call an ambulance in response to Patient B's deterioration, and in the subsequent investigation incorrectly stated she had no knowledge of the pressure sore and that she had called an ambulance but received an engaged tone; (3) the incorrect statements were dishonest; (4) between November 2019 and January 2020 did not complete or update care plans for patients, and by 21 December 2019 had only completed 14 of 425 questions on a patient admission questionnaire; (5) in relation to Patient C, administered olanzapine at the wrong time on three specified dates and did not seek medical advice from a GP.
Findings
The panel found a number of charges proved (1a(iii), 1b, 2a(ii)(a), 2a(ii)(b), 2b(i), 2b(ii), 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a(i)-(iii), 5b) and others not proved (1a(i), 1a(ii), 2a(i)(a)-(e)). The panel found that charges 4a and 4b, while proved factually, did not amount to misconduct (performance rather than misconduct), but that the remaining proved charges did amount to misconduct, including dishonest statements made in the investigation. The panel determined that her fitness to practise is currently impaired on grounds of both public protection and public interest, finding a deep-seated attitudinal issue evidenced by the dishonesty findings and the absence of reflection or insight into the concerns. The hearing was adjourned part-heard before reaching the sanction stage; an interim suspension order for 18 months was imposed.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.