Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
Practising with restrictions — 2 years
The regulator’s term: conditions on practice
What does “practising with restrictions” mean?
Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.
Concerning Amoolya Prasad, doctor (General Medical Council 2575269).
Decision date: 16 July 2025 · Hearing started 14 July 2025 and ended 16 July 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a performance case for Amoolya Prasad. It recorded the decision on impairment as impaired and imposed conditions for 24 months. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2013 7. In 2012, a Performance Assessment Team (‘PAT’) found Dr Prasad’s professional performance to be unacceptable in several areas and was of the opinion that Dr Prasad was only fit to practise on a limited basis, under direct supervision. In addition, Dr Prasad had acted in breach of conditions imposed on his registration by an Interim Orders Panel by failing to have his work supervised by a named GP. 8. Dr Prasad’s case was first considered by a Fitness to Practise Panel in 2013 in relation to allegations of misconduct and deficient professional performance. 9. The 2013 Panel determined that breaching the interim order amounted to serious misconduct as Dr Prasad’s work was not supervised at a time when there were concerns about his professional performance which, potentially, put patients at risk. The Panel also found, on the basis of the PAT Report, that Dr Prasad’s performance was unacceptably low and therefore deficient, with a significant risk that he could put ‘a patient or patients at unwarranted risk of harm’. Finding Dr Prasad’s fitness to practise impaired by reason of both misconduct and deficient professional performance, the Panel went on to impose conditions on Dr Prasad’s registration for a period of 18 months, a decision that Dr Prasad appealed in the High Court. In 2015, the High Court dismissed Dr Prasad’s appeal but removed one of the conditions. Record of Determinations – Medical Practitioners Tribunal MPT: Dr PRASAD 4 2016 10. A Tribunal reviewed Dr Prasad’s case in 2016. It determined that Dr Prasad’s fitness to practise was no longer impaired by reason of misconduct. 11. In respect of his deficient professional performance, Dr Prasad had undertaken another performance assessment in January 2016. The 2016 PAT found that while Dr Prasad had...
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a performance case for Amoolya Prasad. The detail page records impairment as impaired and the tribunal imposed conditions for 24 months.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.