Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — interim orders hearing
Interim restrictions imposed
The regulator’s term: interim order imposed
What does “interim restrictions imposed” mean?
An interim order is a precautionary restriction imposed before the regulator's investigation is complete. It is not a finding of fault — the underlying allegations have not yet been adjudicated.
Concerning Baber Khan, dentist (General Dental Council 56620).
Decision date: 18 February 2026 · Hearing started 18 February 2026
In plain English
The Dental Professionals Hearings Service published an Interim Orders Committee decision for Baber Khan. The committee continued the interim conditions. This is an interim, precautionary decision while the GDC process continues, and the public detail page does not record final findings about the underlying concerns.
Charges
The DPHS public detail page records an Interim Orders Committee decision. It does not set out final charges or final findings; interim orders are precautionary restrictions while the GDC process continues.
Findings
The Dental Professionals Hearings Service records that the Interim Orders Committee continued the interim conditions for Baber Khan. The public outcome summary states: At a review hearing on 18 February 2026, the Interim Orders Committee continued the conditions on Mr Khan's registration for the remainder of the High Court extension. The interim was order was originally imposed from 23 June 2023. On 18 December 2024 the High Court extended the order for 12 months. On 11 December 2025, the High Court extended the order for 6 months. This will be reviewed in 6 months. The conditions on registration are listed on Mr Khan's register entry. To visit the register entry, please copy this link and open it in your browser: https://olr.gdc-uk.org/SearchRegister/SearchResult?RegistrationNumber=56620&Surname=&qs=1 Please note that Mr Khan’s registration is currently subject to sanctions under two separate cases.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.