Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
Added to MedicWatch: 5 May 2026Report a correction
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Anatta Nergui, doctor (General Medical Council 5206692).
Decision date: 27 May 2025 · Hearing started 27 May 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Anatta Nergui. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 3. Dr Nergui qualified in in 1995 from Punjab University in Pakistan and prior to the events which are the subject of the hearing, Dr Nergui obtained a diploma in Psychological Medicine at the Royal College of Physicians & Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland in 2000. Dr Nergui also obtained a postgraduate certificate in cognitive ageing research methods for medical scientists from the University of Edinburgh in 2013. At the time of the relevant events Dr Nergui was practising as a middle grade doctor in psychiatry at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. The 2023 Tribunal 4. A Medical Practitioners Tribunal (MPT) hearing took place in May 2023 (‘the 2023 Tribunal’). The proven facts that the May 2023 Tribunal found amounted to misconduct can be summarised as follows. 5. On 18 March 2020 Dr Nergui was convicted by Glasgow Sheriff Court of engaging in a course of conduct which caused fear or alarm, contrary to section 39(1) of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 and resisting, obstructing or hindering the Police Service of Scotland Officer in their duty, contrary to section 90(2)(a) of the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012. On 25 January 2021 he was sentenced to a community punishment order of 18 months supervision and 150 hours of unpaid work. Record of Determinations – Medical Practitioners Tribunal MPT: Dr NERGUI 3 6. The initial concerns were raised with the GMC on 27 November 2018 by Mr A. He reported that Dr Nergui had been harassing XXX for a period of time which included turning up uninvited to XXX, once very early in the morning, and requesting to see Ms B. It was also stated that Dr Nergui had sent hundreds of communications to Ms B which were handed over to the police. These included communications including topics relating...
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Anatta Nergui. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.