Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — substantive hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Ayesha Afzal, doctor (General Medical Council 6092746).
Decision date: 27 June 2025 · Hearing started 23 June 2025 and ended 27 June 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Ayesha Afzal. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 1. Dr Afzal qualified in 2002 from Ziauddin Medical College in Karachi, Pakistan. At the time of the events Dr Afzal was a CT1 doctor at West Suffolk Hospital (“the Trust”) . 2.
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Ayesha Afzal. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.