MedicWatchAn independent record

Health and Care Professions Council determination — substantive hearing

HCPTS panel strikes off Adam Brown after conviction

The biomedical scientist was struck off after a conviction for attempted sexual communication with a child.

MedicWatch editorial · Published 27 February 2025 · Updated 23 September 2026

Erasure (struck off the register)

Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction

What does “struck off the register” mean?

The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.

Concerning Adam Brown, biomedical scientist (Health and Care Professions Council BS37636).

Decision date: 27 February 2025 · Hearing started 27 February 2025

In plain English

The HCPTS panel considered biomedical scientist Adam Brown's conviction for attempting sexual communication with someone he believed was a 13-year-old girl. Although he had undertaken courses and counselling, the panel found incomplete acceptance and a continuing risk of repetition. It concluded that the offence was fundamentally incompatible with registration and struck him off.

Charges

Mr Brown, formerly Richard Scott, was convicted of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child after several weeks of sexual conversations with a person he believed was a 13-year-old girl.

Findings

The panel found continuing personal impairment because he had not fully accepted the gravity of his conduct and a sufficient risk of repetition remained. It also found public-interest impairment. Despite remediation steps and mitigation, the child-related sexual offence was fundamentally incompatible with continued registration, so he was struck off.

Mitigating and aggravating factors

Mitigating factors

The Registrant pleaded guilty; he had no other criminal convictions or regulatory findings; he apologised; he showed some acknowledgement of the seriousness of his actions; he undertook steps intended to remediate; the matter seriously affected his personal life and domestic circumstances; a very positive professional testimonial was provided.

Source

All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.

Spot something incorrect?

If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.

Choose what works for you. Your choices are remembered for 180 days and you can change them any time using Cookie settings.