Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Ahmad Raslan, doctor (General Medical Council 7792160).
Decision date: 11 September 2025 · Hearing started 11 September 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Ahmad Raslan. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Raslan qualified in 1996 with MB ChB from the South Valley University, Egypt. Dr Raslan worked as a locum Consultant oncologist from August 2021 at the Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust [‘the Trust’]. He principally worked at St Margaret’s Hospice [‘the Hospice’] where he had his office. August 2024 3.
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Ahmad Raslan. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.