Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — substantive hearing
No impairment found
Added to MedicWatch: 5 May 2026Report a correction
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Bobby Shabbir, doctor (General Medical Council 7980452).
Decision date: 23 May 2025 · Hearing started 20 May 2025 and ended 23 May 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Bobby Shabbir. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Shabbir qualified in 2021 from Sofia Medical University, Bulgaria. He has not practised medicine in any capacity since qualification. 3. Prior to this, Dr Shabbir was admitted to the roll of solicitors in 2006. Whilst working as a solicitor he was an associate of a firm of solicitors from 11 May to 20 August 2009 and a salaried partner of the same firm from 21 August to 8 December 2009. As a result of the actions of six solicitors at the firm, disciplinary action was taken by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Dr Shabbir made admissions in respect of
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Bobby Shabbir. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.