Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — review hearing
Erasure (struck off the register)
Added to MedicWatch: 3 May 2026Report a correction
What does “struck off the register” mean?
The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.
Concerning Susan Diane Oosenbrugh, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 95J0186S).
Decision date: 6 February 2026 · Hearing started 6 February 2026
In plain English
The NMC's Fitness to Practise Committee reviewed Susan Diane Oosenbrugh's existing suspension order at a meeting on 6 February 2026 and found that her fitness to practise remained impaired. The original misconduct was linked to the death of a resident. No evidence of insight, remorse or remediation had been provided. The panel determined that a striking-off order was necessary, to take effect on 26 March 2026 when the existing suspension expired.
Charges
The review concerned a suspension order imposed for misconduct linked to the death of a resident.
Findings
The panel found that Susan Diane Oosenbrugh's fitness to practise remained impaired. No evidence of insight, reflection, remediation or engagement had been provided despite clear guidance from the original panel and previous review panels. The panel determined that a further suspension would serve no useful purpose and that a striking-off order was necessary to protect the public. The order was to take effect at the expiry of the existing suspension order on 26 March 2026 in accordance with Article 30(1).
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.