Health and Care Professions Council determination — other
Paramedic receives one-year caution for working beyond scope of practice
Adam Richard Sharman admitted performing an examination without the required training. The panel accepted remediation and found insufficient evidence of sexual motivation.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 14 July 2026 · Updated 22 September 2026
Warning (formally warned) — 1 year
Data last checked: 22 September 2026Report a correction
What does “formally warned” mean?
A formal warning is a note on the practitioner's record. It does not restrict practice but tells the public that the regulator considered the conduct to have fallen below expected standards.
Concerning Adam Richard Sharman, paramedic (Health and Care Professions Council PA37323).
Decision date: 14 July 2026 · Hearing started 14 July 2026
In plain English
Paramedic Adam Richard Sharman received a one-year caution by consent after admitting that he performed an intimate examination beyond his training and scope of practice. The panel accepted his insight and remediation and assessed the risk of repetition as very low. It agreed there was insufficient evidence of sexual motivation, while a caution remained necessary to uphold professional standards.
Charges
Carrying out a vaginal examination with a speculum on 20 February 2023 beyond his scope of practice.
Findings
The panel approved a consent order after unequivocal admissions of the facts, misconduct and current impairment. It agreed there was insufficient evidence of sexual motivation: the concern was competence to perform a clinically indicated examination. It accepted developed insight, remediation and a very low repetition risk, and considered impairment and a caution necessary on public-interest grounds. A one-year caution will appear on the register from the operative date after the appeal period or disposal of an appeal.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.