Health and Care Professions Council determination — substantive hearing
HCPTS panel strikes off Graham Scott over sexual misconduct toward colleagues
A panel ordered paramedic Graham Scott's erasure after finding a repeated pattern of sexually motivated and predatory behaviour toward female colleagues.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 21 March 2025 · Updated 23 September 2026
Erasure (struck off the register)
Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction
What does “struck off the register” mean?
The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.
Concerning Graham Scott, paramedic (Health and Care Professions Council PA36117).
Decision date: 21 March 2025 · Hearing started 17 March 2025 and ended 21 March 2025
In plain English
The HCPTS panel found that paramedic Graham Scott repeatedly made sexually motivated comments and propositions to younger or junior female colleagues and touched another colleague's thigh. It found serious misconduct, current impairment and a high risk of repetition, ordered erasure and imposed an 18-month interim suspension for the appeal period.
Charges
It was alleged that the Registrant made repeated sexually inappropriate comments and propositions to two female colleagues between 2018 and October 2020, touched a third colleague's thigh in October 2020, and that his conduct toward the first two colleagues was sexually motivated. The conduct was alleged to amount to misconduct and impairment.
Findings
The Panel found Particulars 1(a) to 1(d), 2(a) to 2(d), 3 and 4 proved. It found serious misconduct and current impairment on both personal and public grounds, with a high risk of repetition in the absence of insight, remorse or remediation. It ordered erasure and imposed an 18-month interim suspension for the appeal period.
Mitigating and aggravating factors
Aggravating factors
An abuse of position as a senior paramedic to prey upon younger and/or more junior female colleagues. A repeated pattern of predatory and unacceptable behaviour, including sexually motivated behaviour towards colleagues. In the case of Colleague B this took place over a significant period of time. Harmful behaviour towards colleagues and behaviour that had the potential to cause harm to Service Users and the wider public. A complete lack of insight, remorse, apology and remediation.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.