Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — interim orders hearing
GDC committee continues interim suspension of dentist Gaiva Kazuliene
The General Dental Council's Interim Orders Committee has continued the suspension of dentist Gaiva Kazuliene at a review hearing on 11 August 2026. The order, first imposed in September 2025, is due to expire on 23 December 2026, and the GDC says it will ask the High Court to extend it.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 11 August 2026 · Updated 17 August 2026
Interim order extended (interim restrictions extended)
Added to MedicWatch: 17 August 2026Report a correction
What does “interim restrictions extended” mean?
An existing interim order has been extended for a further period while the investigation continues.
Concerning Gaiva Kazuliene, dentist (General Dental Council 100392).
Decision date: 11 August 2026 · Hearing started 11 August 2026
In plain English
The GDC tribunal decided that Gaiva Kazuliene's registration as a dentist should stay suspended. The Interim Orders Committee reviewed her case on 11 August 2026 and continued the suspension for the remainder of a 15-month order first imposed on 24 September 2025. The suspension was also continued at a review on 5 March 2026. The record says it will be reviewed in 6 months and is due to expire on 23 December 2026, when the GDC will ask the High Court to extend it.
Findings
The published record states that at a review hearing on 11 August 2026 the Interim Orders Committee continued the suspension on Ms Kazuliene's registration for the remainder of the 15-month order. An interim order of suspension was originally imposed on 24 September 2025, and at a review hearing on 5 March 2026 the Interim Orders Committee continued the suspension. The record states this will be reviewed in 6 months, that the interim order is due to expire on 23 December 2026, and that the GDC will be applying to the High Court for an extension of it; if such an application is granted the order will be reviewed in accordance with the GDC's statutory requirements. No charges or findings of fact are set out in the public record for this hearing.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.