Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Abeer Mursi, doctor (General Medical Council 7979037).
Decision date: 6 June 2025 · Hearing started 6 June 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Abeer Mursi. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Mursi qualified as a doctor in 2003 from the University of Khartoum, Sudan. Prior to the events which are the subject of the hearing Dr Mursi held various medical posts in Sudan from 2004 to April 2014. She then commenced a post in the United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’) from April 2014. At the time of the events, Dr Mursi was practising as an Internal Medicine Specialist at the University Hospital Sharjah, UAE. May 2024 Tribunal 3. At the outset of Dr Mursi’s hearing, which took place in May 2024, she admitted
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Abeer Mursi. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.