Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
Added to MedicWatch: 5 May 2026Report a correction
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Mohammad Sohail, doctor (General Medical Council 5198513).
Decision date: 30 May 2025 · Hearing started 30 May 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct, conviction / caution case for Mohammad Sohail. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Sohail qualified in 1995 from the University of Punjab, Pakistan. He worked in various roles with the Aesthetics and Intensive Care. At the time of the events giving rise to the concerns in this case relating to Patient A, Dr Sohail was practising as a consultant at Fairfield Hospital (‘the Hospital’) on the Intensive Care Unit (‘ICU’). 3. It was alleged that Dr Sohail acted dishonestly in his conversations with Ms B regarding the care he provided to Patient A and when completing and submitting a job application form (’the form’) to West Middlesex Hospital, in which he did not disclose his regulatory history. It was also alleged that Dr Sohail accepted a Police caution for sending malicious communications, which were of an offensive and racist nature, to a woman he had met online. Dr Sohail admitted to during his Police interview and accepted a criminal caution. He was also required to attend a Victim Awareness Course. The 2024 Tribunal 4. Dr Sohail’s case was referred to a Medical Practitioners Tribunal (‘MPT’) which commenced on 24 June 2024 and concluded on 9 July 2024 (‘the 2024 Tribunal’). At that hearing, Dr Sohail admitted
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct, conviction / caution case for Mohammad Sohail. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.