Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Belinda Agoe, doctor (General Medical Council 5151701).
Decision date: 17 October 2025 · Hearing started 17 October 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Belinda Agoe. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Agoe qualified in 1986 from the Peoples’ Friendship University in Moscow. She joined the Staunton Group Practice (‘the Practice’) as a GP Trainee in August 2005, becoming a GP partner with seven other GPs in 2008. By 2013 the Practice had reduced to having four Partners including Dr Agoe. 3. The facts found proved at Dr Agoe’s hearing, which concluded in March 2024, can be summarised as between 1 November 2018 and 6 November 2018, whilst the Staunton Group Practice’s registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) was suspended, Dr Agoe obstructed the transfer of provision of patient services to an alternative caretaker provider (Federated 4 Health). It was also found that, on more than one occasion, she organised and/or delivered patient services when she knew it was unlawful for her to do so. The 2024 Tribunal found that Dr Agoe had given oral evidence under oath to the First Tier Tribunal that she was unaware until 1 November 2018 that there was to be a handover to a caretaking practice. The 2024 Tribunal also found that Dr Agoe knew that an application to cancel the Staunton Group Practice’s CQC registration was to be made to the Magistrates Court on 6 November 2018. 4. The 2024 Tribunal found that Dr Agoe’s conduct amounted to misconduct and was not satisfied that she had developed any meaningful insight into her misconduct and how it undermined patient safety, public confidence in the profession and proper professional standards. Given the lack of insight and remediation, the 2024 Tribunal could not be satisfied that Dr Agoe would not repeat her misconduct if such similar circumstances Record of Determinations – Medical Practitioners Tribunal MPT: Dr AGOE 3 arose in the future. As such, it determined that Dr Agoe’s fitness to practise was impaired by...
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Belinda Agoe. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.