Health and Care Professions Council determination — review hearing
HCPTS panel strikes off Diana Zuramskiene after competence review
An HCPTS panel struck radiographer Diana Zuramskiene from the register after finding continued impairment and no evidence that she had addressed serious competence concerns.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 11 July 2023 · Updated 23 September 2026
Erasure (struck off the register)
Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction
What does “struck off the register” mean?
The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.
Concerning Diana Zuramskiene, radiographer (Health and Care Professions Council RA78060).
Decision date: 11 July 2023 · Hearing started 11 July 2023
In plain English
The HCPTS panel found that radiographer Diana Zuramskiene remained impaired through lack of competence after providing no evidence of insight, remediation, education or current professional development. She had not engaged with the regulator for more than three years. The panel concluded that further suspension would serve no useful purpose and ordered her struck from the register.
Charges
The original allegations concerned failures to demonstrate basic or appropriate radiography skills and knowledge in several examinations, including using equipment, selecting projections and areas for imaging, following local protocols, and checking a patient's last menstrual period before abdominal imaging.
Findings
The review panel found Diana Zuramskiene remained impaired through lack of competence. It had no evidence of improved insight, remediation, education or professional development, and noted that she had not engaged with the regulator for more than three years. It found no useful purpose in further suspension and directed that she be struck from the register.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.