Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — interim orders hearing
GDC committee continues practice conditions on dentist Baber Khan
The General Dental Council's Interim Orders Committee has continued the conditions on dentist Baber Khan's registration at a review hearing on 14 August 2026, keeping them in place for the remainder of a High Court extension granted on 29 May 2026.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 14 August 2026 · Updated 17 August 2026
Interim order extended (interim restrictions extended)
Added to MedicWatch: 17 August 2026Report a correction
What does “interim restrictions extended” mean?
An existing interim order has been extended for a further period while the investigation continues.
Concerning Baber Khan, dentist (General Dental Council 56620).
Decision date: 14 August 2026 · Hearing started 13 August 2026
In plain English
The GDC tribunal decided that the conditions on Baber Khan's dental registration should continue. The Interim Orders Committee reviewed his case and kept the conditions in place for the remainder of a High Court extension. The interim order was first imposed from 23 June 2023, and the High Court extended it in December 2024, December 2025 and again on 29 May 2026. The record says the order will be reviewed in 6 months, and that his registration is currently subject to sanctions under two separate cases.
Findings
The published record lists the hearing before the Interim Orders Committee on 13 August 2026 and states that at a review hearing on 14 August 2026 the committee continued the conditions on Mr Khan's registration for the remainder of the High Court extension. The interim order was originally imposed from 23 June 2023. On 18 December 2024 the High Court extended the order for 12 months, on 11 December 2025 for 6 months, and on 29 May 2026 for a further 12 months. The record states this will be reviewed in 6 months, that the conditions on registration are listed on Mr Khan's GDC register entry, and that his registration is currently subject to sanctions under two separate cases. No charges or findings of fact are set out in the public record for this hearing.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.