MedicWatchAn independent record

Health and Care Professions Council determination — substantive hearing

HCPTS removes Rodrigo J Cabral Rodrigues from register

The panel found persistent sexual misconduct, including sexual assault and intimidation, and imposed an interim suspension during the appeal period.

MedicWatch editorial · Published 18 May 2026 · Updated 23 September 2026

Erasure (struck off the register)

Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction

What does “struck off the register” mean?

The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.

Concerning Rodrigo J Cabral Rodrigues, radiographer (Health and Care Professions Council RA75143).

Decision date: 18 May 2026 · Hearing started 5 May 2026 and ended 18 May 2026

In plain English

The HCPTS panel ordered Rodrigo J Cabral Rodrigues to be removed from the register after finding persistent sexual misconduct towards a colleague, including sexual assault, intimidation and abuse of his senior position. It found the conduct fundamentally incompatible with registration and imposed an interim suspension during the appeal period.

Charges

The allegations concerned repeated sexual comments and conduct towards colleagues, failures to maintain professional boundaries, sexual motivation and misconduct.

Findings

The panel found persistent sexual misconduct, including sexual assault, intimidation and abuse of a senior position. It found the conduct fundamentally incompatible with registration, ordered removal from the register and imposed an interim suspension for the appeal period, subject to 18 months.

Mitigating and aggravating factors

Aggravating factors

• The proven facts involve serious breaches of professional boundaries and an abuse by the Registrant of his relatively senior position in relation to Colleague A to subject her to unwanted sexualised comments and conduct, including a sexual assault. • There was a pattern of sexual and sexually motivated behaviour by the Registrant towards Colleague A, escalating over a period of several days. • The Registrant sought to use his senior position to intimidate Colleague A by telling her that no-one would believe her, and by threatening that he would have her lose her job, if she reported him. • He persisted with his conduct towards Colleague A despite being warned repeatedly by Colleague B that he should stop because it was causing her distress. • His conduct had the potential to create a toxic work environment causing his colleagues to be distracted from their responsibilities to the detriment of patients. • The Registrant’s sexual assault on Colleague A caused her physical bruising, emotional distress and long-term psychological harm. • The Registrant maintained, despite being presented with evidence to the contrary, that his conduct amounted to harmless banter. • He has not provided any apology or shown any remorse, reflection, insight or remediation. He has demonstrated no perception of the effect of his conduct on Colleague A or its negative impact on the workplace, his reputation or the reputation of the profession. • His response to the complaints about his conduct was to allege fabrication by Colleague A for personal advantage and collusion with Colleague B.

Source

All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.

Spot something incorrect?

If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.

Choose what works for you. Your choices are remembered for 180 days and you can change them any time using Cookie settings.