Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
MPTS finds Dr Trevor Milligan no longer impaired by misconduct or conviction
The tribunal recognised insight and positive supervision reports. Its published outcome records six months of conditions and another review, with the remaining grounds and reasons redacted.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 27 August 2026 · Updated 22 September 2026
Conditions on practice (practising with restrictions) — 6 months
Data last checked: 22 September 2026Report a correction
What does “practising with restrictions” mean?
Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.
Concerning Trevor Sean MILLIGAN, doctor (General Medical Council 4431589).
Decision date: 27 August 2026 · Hearing started 27 August 2026
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr Trevor Milligan's fitness to practise was no longer impaired by misconduct or conviction, recognising his insight, progress and positive supervision reports. The review concerned earlier alcohol-related misconduct and a drink-driving conviction. Its published outcome records conditions for six months and another review, while the remaining grounds and detailed reasons are redacted from the public decision.
Charges
This review concerned findings made in February 2025 about drinking alcohol while conducting a clinic in 2022 and a drink-driving conviction arising from June 2023. Other matters were redacted from the regulator's public decision. The review did not determine new charges.
Findings
The tribunal found that fitness to practise was no longer impaired by reason of misconduct or conviction. It recognised insight, remediation, no repetition of criminal conduct and outstanding supervision reports. The published outcome nevertheless records conditions for six months and a further review; the remaining grounds and detailed reasons were redacted from the public record.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.