Health and Care Professions Council determination — other
HCPTS discontinues health allegation against Paul Winfield
Updated medical evidence did not establish a current health condition or a realistic prospect of proving impairment.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 10 September 2024 · Updated 23 September 2026
No impairment found
Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator found no current impairment in this decision. Read the decision for its effect on any existing order and check the official register for the practitioner's current status.
Concerning Paul Winfield, paramedic (Health and Care Professions Council PA26753).
Decision date: 10 September 2024 · Hearing started 10 September 2024
In plain English
The HCPTS panel discontinued the health allegation against paramedic Paul Winfield in full. Updated GP evidence did not show a current health condition and indicated that the historical concerns had resolved. With no realistic prospect of proving current impairment, the panel found no public interest in continuing the case.
Charges
Mr Winfield's fitness to practise was alleged to be impaired by health conditions whose details were redacted from the public determination.
Findings
The panel accepted the HCPC's application to discontinue the allegation in full. Updated evidence from Mr Winfield's GP did not establish a current health condition and indicated that the historical concerns had resolved. The panel found no realistic prospect of proving the allegation and no public interest in continuing it.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.