Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — review hearing
Other outcome
The regulator’s term: other
What does “other outcome” mean?
An outcome that does not fit standard categories. See the source determination for full details.
Concerning Emmanuel Xavier Udo, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 03G0252O).
Decision date: 13 February 2026 · Hearing started 13 February 2026
In plain English
The NMC Fitness to Practise Committee held a substantive order review hearing for Emmanuel Xavier Udo in a misconduct case. The panel was reviewing Emmanuel Xavier Udo's existing Conditions of practice order (18 months). It recorded fitness to practise as impaired. The panel allowed the existing order to lapse at expiry. The published document gives the full reasons and underlying charge details.
Charges
The previous charges found proved were: ‘That you, a registered nurse: 1) On 18 January 2018, administered analgesia to the wrong patient; 2) On 27 November 2018, failed to undertake frequently or at all, observations on a post-operative patient; 3) On 10 August 2019. administered medication to a patient while the patient was asleep, causing a choking hazard; 4) On 19 April having administered Lorazepam to a patient, you failed to sign the drug chart to confirm this had been done; 5) On 22 October 2020 you: a) failed to administer insulin to a patient at the prescribed time; Page 5 of 17 6) Between 24 October 2020 and 25 October 2020, you administered incorrect dose/s of insulin to a patient in your care; a) Administered incorrect doses of insulin to a patient; b) Administered 14 units of insulin instead of the prescribed 18 units 7) During a night shift on 27 October 2021, you failed to conduct frequently or at all, clinical observations for Patient A; 8) On 17 November 2021: a) during handover you provided colleagues with inadequate information relating to patients you had cared for; b) in relation to Patient B you: i. failed to ensure that both dextrose and insulin were attached to the syringe pump as prescribed; ii. failed to sign out controlled drugs in the presence of a second nurse; iii. failed to sign Patient B’s drug chart to confirm intravenous phosphate polyfuser had been administered; iv. administered medication to Patient B via an incorrect route and/or without checking the prescribed route for administration; v. failed to follow the correct procedure when setting up a syringe driver by not having a second nurse present; vi. having administered medication, failed to obtain a second nurse’s signature on Patient B’s drug chart; c) In relation to Patient C, you failed to follow the correct procedure for controlled drugs in that you: i. did not have a second nurse present when signing out morphine; ii. did not have a second nurse present when administering morphine; iii. administered morphine to Patient C via an incorrect route and/or without checking the prescribed route for administration; d) In relation to Patient D, you failed to follow the correct procedure for controlled drugs in that you: Page 6 of 17 i. did not have a second nurse present when signing out oxycodone and midazolam; ii. did not obtain a second nurses signature on Patient D’s...
Findings
The NMC Fitness to Practise Committee held a substantive order review hearing for Emmanuel Xavier Udo in a misconduct case. The panel reviewed an existing Conditions of practice order (18 months). It recorded fitness to practise as impaired. The panel allowed the existing order to lapse at expiry.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.