Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — review hearing
NMC panel varies Mavis Sibanda's interim conditions at review
The NMC's Investigating Committee varied Mavis Sibanda's existing interim conditions, retaining workplace limits, supervision, reporting and disclosure requirements.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 29 April 2026 · Updated 23 September 2026
Other (other outcome)
Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction
What does “other outcome” mean?
An outcome that does not fit standard categories. See the source determination for full details.
Concerning Mavis Sibanda, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 02J0965O).
Decision date: 29 April 2026 · Hearing started 29 April 2026
In plain English
The NMC's Investigating Committee varied Mavis Sibanda's existing interim conditions of practice order. It found the revised conditions necessary and proportionate, including workplace limits, supervision, meetings, reports and disclosure duties. The NMC Case Examiners have not yet decided whether there is a case to answer concerning the allegations.
Findings
The Investigating Committee varied the existing interim conditions of practice order and found the revised conditions necessary and proportionate. They govern Ms Sibanda's employer and workplace, prohibit her from being nurse in charge, require supervision, meetings and reports, and impose notification and disclosure duties. The Case Examiners have not yet decided whether there is a case to answer.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.