Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
Practising with restrictions — 2 years
The regulator’s term: conditions on practice
What does “practising with restrictions” mean?
Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.
Concerning Nathan Sandles, doctor (General Medical Council 6127978).
Decision date: 27 June 2025 · Hearing started 27 June 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Nathan Sandles. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired (misconduct/conviction) impaired (xxx) and imposed conditions for 24 months. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 4. Dr Sandles qualified as a doctor in 2005 from Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry. At the time of the events Dr Sandles was practising as a General Practitioner. The 2024 Tribunal 5. At the outset of Dr Sandles’ hearing, which took place in June 2024 (the 2024 Tribunal), he admitted
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Nathan Sandles. The detail page records impairment as not impaired (misconduct/conviction) impaired (xxx) and the tribunal imposed conditions for 24 months.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.