Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
Other outcome
The regulator’s term: other
What does “other outcome” mean?
An outcome that does not fit standard categories. See the source determination for full details.
Concerning Johnathan Saunders, doctor (General Medical Council 7271623).
Decision date: 4 June 2025 · Hearing started 4 June 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Johnathan Saunders. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired (misconduct, caution, conviction) impaired (xxx) and recorded mixed impairment findings without a separate sanction outcome on the detail page. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: to Dr Saunders’ case, which was first considered by a Medical Practitioners Tribunal in April 2024. 2. Dr Saunders qualified in 2013. He commenced his Foundation training in August 2017, concluding in August 2019. Dr Saunders then undertook a number of Locum positions in various hospitals. Dr Saunders was before the Tribunal because of an Allegation of impairment by reason of misconduct, convictions XXX. 3.
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Johnathan Saunders. The detail page records impairment as not impaired (misconduct, caution, conviction) impaired (xxx) and the tribunal recorded mixed impairment findings without a separate sanction outcome on the detail page.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.