Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — substantive hearing
Formally warned
The regulator’s term: warning
What does “formally warned” mean?
A formal warning is a note on the practitioner's record. It does not restrict practice but tells the public that the regulator considered the conduct to have fallen below expected standards.
Concerning Nathaniel Salcedo, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 01K1629O).
Decision date: 26 February 2026 · Hearing started 31 October 2025 and ended 26 February 2026
In plain English
The NMC Fitness to Practise Committee held a substantive hearing for Nathaniel Salcedo in a misconduct case. The cover page records proved facts for Charges 1(a)(i), 1(a)(ii), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d)(i), 1(d)(ii), 1(e), 1(f), 4(a), 4(b) 2 Facts proved: Charges 1(b) by reason of charge 2, 3(b). It recorded fitness to practise as impaired. The panel issued a warning or caution. The published document gives the full reasons and underlying charge details.
Charges
Details of charge: That you, a registered nurse; 1. Intimidated and/or harassed Colleague A, in that; a. Via Systm1 you sent inappropriate messages i. On 13th March 2021 you wrote ‘you look even more prettier tonight’ ii. On 11 April 2021 you wrote ‘you look absolutely gorgeous tonight’ b. On an unknown date in August 2021 said ‘I bet you cannot wait until Summer arrives so that you can wear your sexy clothes’ c. On 1 January 2022 you gifted Colleague A, a pair of pandora earrings 5 d. You massaged Colleague A during an examination when they were seen as a patient on; i. 21 March 2022 ii. 28 August 2021 e. Colleague A did not consent and/or declined massages on one or more occasions on the above dates f. On 22 March 2022 requested for Colleague A to tell Colleague B, that Colleague A would drive you to your home visits. 2. Your conduct in the charges 1a-1f were sexual in nature and/or sexually motivated. 3. Did not ask Colleague A’s consent to place a stethoscope under their clothing to listen to their chest on; a. 21 March 2022 b. 28 August 2021 4. Did not ask Colleague A’s consent to place a stethoscope under their clothing to listen to their chest on; a. 21 March 2022 b. 28 August 2021 AND in light of the above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your misconduct. 6
Findings
The NMC Fitness to Practise Committee held a substantive hearing for Nathaniel Salcedo in a misconduct case. The cover page records facts proved for Charges 1(a)(i), 1(a)(ii), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d)(i), 1(d)(ii), 1(e), 1(f), 4(a), 4(b) 2 Facts proved: Charges 1(b) by reason of charge 2, 3(b). It recorded fitness to practise as impaired. The panel issued a warning or caution.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.