Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — substantive hearing
Conditions on practice (practising with restrictions) — 1 year
Added to MedicWatch: 23 July 2026Report a correction
What does “practising with restrictions” mean?
Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.
Concerning Charlotte Louise Wood, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 95J2326E).
Decision date: 22 July 2026 · Hearing started 13 July 2026 and ended 22 July 2026
In plain English
The NMC found that Charlotte Louise Wood, a registered nurse, admitted the facts of most charges against her; one charge was not proved. The Fitness to Practise Committee decided her fitness to practise was impaired and imposed a conditions of practice order for 12 months, plus an interim conditions of practice order for 18 months. The panel accepted an application for the health case to be heard in private under Rule 19, so the details are not in the public record.
Charges
The substantive content of the charges is not in the public record: the panel accepted an application under Rule 19 of the Nursing and Midwifery Fitness to Practise Rules Order of Council 2004 to hear all matters in private. The published record states the facts were proved by way of admission for charges 1, 2a-2c, 3a-3d, 4a, 4b, 5, 6a, 6b, 7a-7d, 8, 9, 10, 12a-12d, 13a-13c, 14a, 14b, 15, 16a, 16b and 17, and that charge 11 was not proved. The type of case is recorded as Health.
Findings
The Fitness to Practise Committee recorded fitness to practise as impaired. The sanction recorded is a conditions of practice order for 12 months, with an interim conditions of practice order for 18 months. Because all matters were heard in private under Rule 19, the panel's reasoning on the facts, impairment and sanction is not in the public record.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.