Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — substantive hearing
GDC's Professional Conduct Committee suspends dentist Amar Arjuna for three months
The General Dental Council's Professional Conduct Committee has suspended dentist Amar Sundeep Arjuna for three months and ordered his registration suspended immediately. The published hearing record does not set out the charges, and the decision remains within the appeal period.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 4 August 2026 · Updated 17 August 2026
Suspension (suspended from practice) — 3 months
Added to MedicWatch: 17 August 2026Report a correction
What does “suspended from practice” mean?
A suspension is a fixed-term pause on the right to practise. The practitioner cannot work in the regulated profession during the suspension. At the end of the period the suspension may be extended, replaced with another sanction, or lifted on review.
Concerning Amar Sundeep Arjuna, dentist (General Dental Council 225339).
Decision date: 4 August 2026 · Hearing started 3 August 2026
In plain English
The GDC tribunal decided that Mr Amar Sundeep Arjuna, a dentist, should be suspended from the register for three months. The Professional Conduct Committee made the decision on 4 August 2026, after a hearing on 3 August 2026, and ordered that his registration be suspended immediately. The suspension will be reviewed before the order ends. The published hearing record sets out the outcome only, so the charges and the Committee's reasons are not available. The record notes the decision was within the appeal period.
Charges
Not stated in the published hearing record. The Dental Professionals Hearings Service page for this hearing lists the outcome only; no determination document was available.
Findings
The published record states the outcome only: on 4 August 2026 the Professional Conduct Committee suspended Mr Arjuna for a period of three months, to be reviewed before the end of the order, and ordered that his registration be suspended immediately. The Committee's detailed findings are not in the published record. The entry is marked as within the appeal period.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.