Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — registration appeal
GDC committee dismisses dental nurse Tiffani Seymour's appeal against CPD removal
The GDC's Registration Appeals Committee has dismissed an appeal by dental nurse Tiffani Rose Seymour against her removal from the Dental Care Professionals register for non-compliance with continuing professional development requirements, meaning the removal stands.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 14 July 2026 · Updated 17 July 2026
Appeal dismissed (appeal against removal dismissed)
Added to MedicWatch: 17 July 2026Report a correction
What does “appeal against removal dismissed” mean?
The practitioner appealed against an administrative decision (typically removal from the register for non-compliance) and the regulator's appeal committee dismissed the appeal — the original decision stands.
Concerning Tiffani Rose Seymour, dental nurse (General Dental Council 185083).
Decision date: 14 July 2026 · Hearing started 12 July 2026 and ended 17 July 2026
In plain English
The GDC's Registration Appeals Committee dismissed dental nurse Tiffani Rose Seymour's appeal against the decision to remove her from the Dental Care Professionals register for non-compliance with continuing professional development (CPD) requirements. The committee made its decision on 14 July 2026, following a hearing that began on 12 July 2026. The original removal decision therefore stands.
Charges
Appeal to the Registration Appeals Committee against the decision to remove the practitioner from the Dental Care Professionals register for non-compliance with continuing professional development (CPD) requirements.
Findings
On 14 July 2026, the Registration Appeals Committee dismissed the appeal against the decision to remove the practitioner from the Dental Care Professionals register for non-compliance with CPD requirements. The removal decision stands.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.