Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination — registration appeal
GDC appeals committee grants registration appeal by hygienist Laila Al Rawhani
The General Dental Council's Registration Appeals Committee has granted the registration appeal of dental hygienist and dental nurse Laila Abdulwahab Mohammed Al Rawhani, allowing her appeal on Matter C and remitting Matter D to the Registrar.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 20 August 2026 · Updated 1 September 2026
Appeal allowed (appeal succeeded)
Added to MedicWatch: 31 August 2026Report a correction
What does “appeal succeeded” mean?
The practitioner appealed against an administrative decision (typically a refusal of registration or removal from the register) and the regulator's appeal committee allowed the appeal — the original decision was overturned.
Concerning Laila Abdulwahab Mohammed Al Rawhani, dental hygienist (General Dental Council 293362).
Decision date: 20 August 2026 · Hearing started 20 August 2026
In plain English
The GDC tribunal decided that the registration appeal brought by Laila Abdulwahab Mohammed Al Rawhani, a dental hygienist and dental nurse, was granted. On 20 August 2026 the Registration Appeals Committee allowed her appeal in relation to Matter C and remitted the case back to the Registrar in relation to Matter D. The published hearing record gives the outcome only. It does not set out the committee's reasons or explain what Matters C and D concerned.
Findings
The published record states the outcome only: on 20 August 2026 the Registration Appeals Committee allowed Ms Al Rawhani's appeal in relation to Matter C and remitted the case back to the Registrar in relation to Matter D. The published outcome is recorded as 'Appeal Granted'. The hearing is listed as a Registration Appeal (Initial). The Committee's reasons, and the subject matter of Matters C and D, are not set out in the published hearing record.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Dental Professionals Hearings Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.