Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Tarek Hosny Wasim Mitwally Seda, doctor (General Medical Council 6124507).
Decision date: 3 September 2025 · Hearing started 2 September 2025 and ended 3 September 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Tarek Hosny Wasim Mitwally Seda. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Seda qualified from Ain Shams University, Egypt, in 2002. He has previously worked as a General Practitioner at a private clinic in Harley Street, London, and as a Specialty Doctor in Emergency Medicine at Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’). 3. Dr Seda has been the subject of two GMC Allegations considered at MPT hearings at which facts were found against him and where his fitness to practise was found to be impaired. Dr Seda’s case was first considered by an MPT in 2019. His fitness to practise was found to be impaired as a result of his misconduct by the 2019 Tribunal. At a new and review hearing in April 2023, a further finding of impairment was made, arising from Dr Seda having accepted a police caution. Misconduct 4. The misconduct found proved related to Dr Seda failing to adhere to allocated break times and failing to carry out several actions required for the assessment and treatment of Record of Determinations – Medical Practitioners Tribunal MPT: Dr SEDA 3 patients whilst practising as a private GP for Doctorcall in Harley Street, London, and as a Specialty Doctor in Emergency Medicine at the Trust. Further, Dr Seda’s actions were found to have been dishonest in two respects. Firstly, when he failed to inform a locum agency of his IOT conditions and offered to take up one day’s employment in breach of these conditions. Secondly, Dr Seda admitted creating a false certificate of employment purporting to be from Doctorcall Medical Services and submitted this to the Dataflow Group. 5. Dr Seda’s case was first reviewed on 21 December 2020. The 2020 Tribunal found that his fitness to practise remained impaired by reason of misconduct. However, it acknowledged the steps taken by Dr Seda to address his dishonesty and determined that...
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a conviction / caution, misconduct case for Tarek Hosny Wasim Mitwally Seda. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.