Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — restoration hearing
Restored to the register
The regulator’s term: restoration granted
What does “restored to the register” mean?
A practitioner who had been struck off applied for restoration to the register and the application was granted.
Concerning Paul Grant, doctor (General Medical Council 6057253).
Decision date: 22 October 2025 · Hearing started 20 October 2025 and ended 22 October 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a restoration case for Paul Grant. It recorded the decision on impairment as not recorded and granted the doctor's restoration application. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 5. Dr Grant qualified in 2002 from the University of London with an MBBS. He also obtained a BSc in Psychology. Dr Grant passed the membership examination for the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in 2006 and commenced his training in General Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetes Mellitus in September 2008. Dr Grant’s name was entered onto the GMC's Specialist Register in June 2013. 6. The events leading to Dr Grant’s erasure took place over several years. His misconduct started when he was a junior doctor and continued when he was a newly appointed consultant. Dr Grant had held locum consultant posts for around three years. He was then appointed as a Consultant Physician in Endocrinology and Diabetes at the Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’). Record of Determinations – Medical Practitioners Tribunal MPT: Dr GRANT 3 7. Dr Grant’s first Medical Practitioners Tribunal (MPT) hearing was in 2017. A subsequent MPT Review hearing considered the matters for which he was suspended in 2017, as well as new allegations. The 2017 Tribunal hearing 8. Dr Grant’s first MPT hearing took place from 13 March to 6 April 2017 and 25 to 26 September 2017 (‘the 2017 Tribunal’). He attended with counsel and made admissions to most paragraphs of
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a restoration case for Paul Grant. The detail page records impairment as not recorded and the tribunal granted the doctor's restoration application.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.