Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Nimrit Dhillon, doctor (General Medical Council 7271166).
Decision date: 30 June 2025 · Hearing started 30 June 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Nimrit Dhillon. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: to Dr Dhillon’s case, which was first considered by a fitness to practise medical practitioners tribunal in November 2024 (“the 2024 Tribunal”). 2. Dr Dhillon qualified as a doctor in 2012 and, in 2023, was working as a General Practitioner and also in aesthetic medicine. 3. She was convicted at Liverpool Magistrates’ Court on 21 August 2023 of three offences of theft by an employee, as follows: i. On 23 May 2023 Dr Dhillon stole one box of Belotero Intense and three one- hundred unit boxes of Bocouture botox to the value of £450; ii. On 1 June 2023 Dr Dhillon stole three one-hundred-unit boxes of Bocouture botox, one box of fifty-units of Bocouture, one box of Belotero Balance and one box of Belotero Volume to the value of £700; and iii. On 8 June 2023 Dr Dhillon stole four boxes of Bocouture one-hundred units to the value of £450. 4. Dr Dhillon was sentenced to a 12-month Community Order with requirements to undertake up to 15 Rehabilitation Requirement days and 200 hours unpaid work. She was also ordered to pay £1,450 compensation. 5. Dr Dhillon admitted the convictions before the 2024 Tribunal and the matters were therefore found proved. 6. In considering whether Dr Dhillon’s fitness to practise was impaired, the 2024 Tribunal found that Dr Dhillon had developed insight but had not fully remediated, and that there remained a risk, albeit low, of repetition of the offending behaviour. 7. The 2024 Tribunal concluded that Dr Dhillon’s fitness to practise was impaired on account of her conviction and stated: Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal Review on Papers MPT: Dr DHILLON 3 “69. In considering whether Dr Dhillon’s fitness to practise is currently impaired, the Tribunal balanced its assessment of her insight, remediation and the risk of...
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Nimrit Dhillon. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.