Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — interim orders hearing
NMC panel confirms Kayleigh Boyd Cunningham's existing interim practice conditions
The NMC confirmed nurse Kayleigh Boyd Cunningham's existing interim conditions, including public work restrictions, supervision, meeting, reporting and disclosure requirements.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 14 May 2026 · Updated 23 September 2026
Interim order confirmed (existing interim order confirmed)
Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction
What does “existing interim order confirmed” mean?
The regulator confirmed an existing interim order at this review. Confirmation does not itself establish a new order period or a final finding on the allegations. Read the decision and check the official register for current restrictions.
Concerning Kayleigh Boyd Cunningham, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 23G3578E).
Decision date: 14 May 2026 · Hearing started 14 May 2026
In plain English
The NMC's Fitness to Practise Committee confirmed Kayleigh Boyd Cunningham's existing interim conditions of practice order. Public conditions restrict her work and duties and require supervision, meetings, reports and disclosure; several details remain private. The panel did not impose a fresh term, and a Fitness to Practise Committee still has to consider the allegations.
Charges
The published interim review decision does not set out the allegations and contains several private redactions. It states that a Fitness to Practise Committee panel still has to deal with the allegations.
Findings
The panel confirmed Kayleigh Boyd Cunningham's existing interim conditions of practice order. Public conditions prohibit agency work and sole or nurse-in-charge duties, limit bank shifts, require indirect supervision and fortnightly meetings, and impose reporting, notification and disclosure duties. Several conditions or parts of conditions remain private.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.