Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — review hearing
No impairment found
What does “no impairment found” mean?
The regulator considered the case and found that the practitioner's fitness to practise was not currently impaired. No restrictions are imposed.
Concerning Maxwell Dugboyele, doctor (General Medical Council 5191132).
Decision date: 25 September 2025 · Hearing started 25 September 2025
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Maxwell Dugboyele. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Charges
The MPTS PDF background states: 2. Dr Dugboyele qualified with an MB ChB from the University of Ghana in 1995. He previously worked at the Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust and in October 2020, the Trust carried out a disciplinary investigation into complaints against him of sexual harassment and inappropriate workplace behaviour. On conclusion of the investigation Dr Dugboyele resigned from his position at that Trust and a referral was received by the GMC from that Trust outlining the concerns originally raised. 3. Dr Dugboyele’s case was first considered by a Medical Practitioners Tribunal in May 2023 (‘the 2023 Tribunal’).
Findings
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal considered a misconduct case for Maxwell Dugboyele. The detail page records impairment as not impaired and the tribunal found the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.