HCPC determination — substantive hearing
Struck off the register
The regulator’s term: erasure
What does “struck off the register” mean?
Being struck off (the regulator calls this "erasure") removes the practitioner from the register. They are no longer permitted to practise this profession in the UK. Erasure can be reviewed after a minimum of five years, but is otherwise indefinite.
Concerning Natalie Twomey, paramedic (HCPC PA35288).
Decision date: 17 December 2025 · Hearing started 8 December 2025 and ended 17 December 2025
In plain English
The HCPTS panel decided that Natalie Twomey should be subject to the published outcome from a final hearing. The panel directed removal from the HCPC Register. The public page records the profession, registration number, allegation, finding, order, notes and hearing history for source verification.
Charges
The HCPTS allegation section states: . It did not include any reference to the impact of the behaviour on the Registrant’s colleagues, service users, or the reputation of the profession. 130. The Panel did not consider that the Registrant had demonstrated any insight or remorse in relation to the findings of dishonesty, and that her insight in relation to her conviction was very limited. 131. The Panel was of the view that the dishonesty in this case is attitudinal in nature. It was deliberate dishonesty, for personal gain, sustained over a period of time between 28 November 2022 and 20 March 2024, and involved ten individual findings of dishonesty, involving two employers and the regulator. The Panel considered that the Registrant’s attitude is long-standing and deep-seated. 132. The Panel considered whether the misconduct in this case is remediable. It was of the view that it would be extremely difficult to remediate the deep-seated attitudinal issues which underlie the Registrant’s behaviour. The Registrant has not presented the Panel with evidence of remediation or reflection relating to dishonesty. 133. Given the very limited insight demonstrated by the Registrant and the absence of evidence of remediation of the underlying attitudinal matters, the Panel considered that there is a real risk of repetition of similar behaviour. If the Registrant were to repeat similar behaviour, there is a real risk of harm to members of the public including: • The HCPC being unable to rely on information provided to the Registrant and consequently unable to perform its statutory functions; • Employers being unable to rely on information provided by the Registrant and unable to trust the Registrant impacting on the effective management and quality of services; • Impact of the Registrant’s lies on colleagues; • The...
Findings
The HCPTS page records a final hearing for Natalie Twomey by the Conduct and Competence Committee. The panel directed removal from the HCPC Register. The allegation section states: . It did not include any reference to the impact of the behaviour on the Registrant’s colleagues, service users, or the reputation of the profession. 130. The Panel did not consider that the Registrant had demonstrated.... The order section states: comes into effect..
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published HCPC determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.