Health and Care Professions Council determination — review hearing
HCPTS replaces Daniel Davis's suspension with six months of conditions
The HCPTS review panel recognised progress and found a further suspension disproportionate. It required training and supervision to address the remaining concerns.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 29 May 2026 · Updated 22 September 2026
Conditions on practice (practising with restrictions) — 6 months
Data last checked: 22 September 2026Report a correction
What does “practising with restrictions” mean?
Conditions of practice allow the practitioner to keep working but only subject to specific restrictions — for example, supervision, limits on certain procedures, or required reporting to the regulator.
Concerning Daniel Davis, paramedic (Health and Care Professions Council PA060598).
Decision date: 29 May 2026 · Hearing started 29 May 2026
In plain English
The HCPTS panel replaced Daniel Davis's suspension with six months of conditions of practice from 19 June 2026. It recognised progress, remorse and developed insight, but found continuing impairment because remediation of the sexually motivated behaviour was incomplete. The conditions include training, indirect workplace supervision and reflective reporting. The order must be reviewed before 19 December 2026.
Charges
The review followed earlier misconduct findings about professional boundaries and sexually motivated behaviour towards a student colleague. The review records that a number of the original particulars were proved, without setting out a complete charge-by-charge result.
Findings
The panel recognised developed insight, remorse, reflection and personal learning, but found insufficient evidence that learning about sexually motivated behaviour had been embedded in practice. It found continuing impairment on personal and public grounds. It replaced suspension with six months of conditions from 19 June 2026, with review before 19 December 2026. Conditions require relevant training, indirect workplace supervision, a development plan, monthly supervisory meetings and reflective reporting, and disclosure to employers and agencies. A further suspension was considered disproportionate.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.