MedicWatchAn independent record

Health and Care Professions Council determination — substantive hearing

HCPTS panel strikes off Francois Marion Jurado

The radiographer was struck off after a child sexual communication conviction and findings of continuing public risk.

MedicWatch editorial · Published 13 December 2024 · Updated 23 September 2026

Erasure (struck off the register)

Data last checked: 23 September 2026Report a correction

What does “struck off the register” mean?

The regulator directed removal from the register in this decision. The decision explains when the direction takes effect and any appeal provisions. Check the official register for the practitioner's current registration status.

Concerning Francois Marion Jurado, radiographer (Health and Care Professions Council RA087148).

Decision date: 13 December 2024 · Hearing started 12 December 2024 and ended 13 December 2024

In plain English

The HCPTS panel considered radiographer Francois Marion Jurado's conviction for sexual communications with someone he believed was a 14-year-old boy. It found virtually no insight, no effective remediation and a continuing risk of sexual reoffending while he remained subject to a criminal sentence. The panel concluded that only striking off could protect the public.

Charges

Mr Jurado was convicted of engaging in sexual communication with a child after repeatedly inviting a person he believed was a 14-year-old boy to his home for sex and sending sexual communications.

Findings

The panel found impairment on public-protection and public-interest grounds. It identified virtually no insight, no evidence of effective remediation, a medium assessed risk of sexual reoffending and a live criminal sentence. It concluded that the predatory conduct was fundamentally incompatible with registration and struck him off.

Mitigating and aggravating factors

Mitigating factors

A late guilty plea at Court; the Judge accepted the assertion that the Registrant was remorseful.

Aggravating factors

Predatory behaviour targeting a 14-year-old child; the Registrant being subject to a live sentence; the Registrant being on the Sex Offenders Register for many years; a complete lack of any meaningful insight or remediation; behaviour that actively undermined the profession.

Source

All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Health and Care Professions Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.

Spot something incorrect?

If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.

Choose what works for you. Your choices are remembered for 180 days and you can change them any time using Cookie settings.