Nursing and Midwifery Council determination — investigation committee
NMC directs removal of Maxwell Murisa's incorrect entry; fraud not proved
The NMC found an incorrect revalidation entry but no proved dishonesty. It directed administrative removal so Maxwell Murisa could reapply for a full assessment and imposed no interim order.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 4 September 2026 · Updated 22 September 2026
Other (other outcome)
Data last checked: 22 September 2026Report a correction
What does “other outcome” mean?
An outcome that does not fit standard categories. See the source determination for full details.
Concerning Maxwell Murisa, nurse (Nursing and Midwifery Council 19G0129E).
Decision date: 4 September 2026 · Hearing started 3 September 2026 and ended 4 September 2026
In plain English
The NMC's Investigating Committee directed removal of Maxwell Murisa's incorrectly made registration entry after he admitted failing to declare driving convictions at revalidation. It expressly found that fraud and dishonesty were not proved, accepting that the omission arose from confusion. The decision allows him to reapply so the Registrar can assess the relevant information. The panel declined to impose an interim order.
Charges
Mr Murisa admitted omitting four April 2022 driving convictions from his July 2022 revalidation declaration: driving while disqualified and without insurance on two dates. He admitted an incorrectly made registration entry but denied fraud. The panel found all non-disclosure particulars proved by admission and found that dishonesty and fraudulent procurement were not proved.
Findings
The NMC Investigating Committee found an incorrect registration entry arising from confusion and misunderstanding, rather than proved deliberate concealment. It noted contemporaneous challenges to the driving matters and his later voluntary self-referral. It directed removal of the incorrect entry under Article 26(7), enabling him to reapply so the Registrar could assess the convictions with all relevant information. This was administrative removal of an incorrect entry, not disciplinary striking off. The panel declined an interim order, noting no dishonesty finding and no incidents during unrestricted practice. It made no fitness-to-practise impairment determination.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Nursing and Midwifery Council determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.