Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination — substantive hearing
MPTS suspends Dr Mohammed Elmajee for 12 months after harassment findings
The tribunal found sexual harassment and impaired fitness to practise, imposing suspension with a review. A lunging allegation was not proved; a separate message was not found to constitute sexual harassment.
MedicWatch editorial · Published 28 August 2026 · Updated 22 September 2026
Suspension (suspended from practice) — 1 year
Data last checked: 22 September 2026Report a correction
What does “suspended from practice” mean?
The regulator imposed a fixed-term suspension in this decision. Its start date, appeal provisions and any later review affect whether it is currently in force. Check the official register for the practitioner's current status.
Concerning Mohammed ELMAJEE, doctor (General Medical Council 7453862).
Decision date: 28 August 2026 · Hearing started 17 August 2026 and ended 28 August 2026
In plain English
The MPTS tribunal suspended Dr Mohammed Elmajee for 12 months after finding that non-consensual kissing and attempted kissing of a colleague amounted to sexual harassment. It found his fitness to practise impaired and directed an immediate suspension and a review. The allegation of lunging was not proved, and a separate WhatsApp message was not found to constitute sexual harassment. The tribunal considered the misconduct potentially remediable and erasure disproportionate.
Charges
The tribunal considered allegations of non-consensual attempts to kiss a colleague in December 2022 and September 2023, a sexually motivated WhatsApp message, sexual harassment and abuse of seniority.
Findings
The tribunal found that two incidents of non-consensual kissing or attempted kissing amounted to sexually motivated harassment and abuse of seniority. The separate allegation of lunging was not proved. The WhatsApp message was found sexually motivated and an abuse of seniority, but was not found to constitute sexual harassment. Fitness to practise was impaired; the tribunal found insufficient insight or remediation and a significant risk of repetition. It imposed 12 months' suspension, an immediate suspension order and a review. It found erasure disproportionate, recognising that the misconduct was potentially remediable and that no serious harm had been established.
Source
All facts on this page are drawn from the publicly published Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service determination linked below. MedicWatch does not editorialise the regulator’s findings.
Spot something incorrect?
If a fact on this page is wrong, or you believe the page should not be published, please submit a correction or takedown request.