Published regulator decisions

UK doctors given formal warnings in 2025

A formal warning records that the regulator considered conduct or performance to have fallen below expected standards. It does not, by itself, restrict practice. This page is generated from source-backed determinations already published on MedicWatch.

Latest matching decisions

5 total

  • Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor

    Warning(formally warned)

    Jonathan Nigate

    The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Jonathan Nigate. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.

    Read the determination

  • Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor

    Warning(formally warned)

    Susannah Thoms

    The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Susannah Thoms. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.

    Read the determination

  • Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor

    Warning(formally warned)

    Gagandeep Sachdeva

    The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Gagandeep Sachdeva. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.

    Read the determination

  • Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor

    Warning(formally warned)

    Amit Goel

    The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Amit Goel. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.

    Read the determination

  • Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor

    Warning(formally warned)

    Chitlapalli Sathyanath

    The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Chitlapalli Sathyanath. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.

    Read the determination

Choose what works for you. Your choices are remembered for 180 days and you can change them any time using Cookie settings.