Published regulator decisions
UK doctors given formal warnings
A formal warning records that the regulator considered conduct or performance to have fallen below expected standards. It does not, by itself, restrict practice. This page is generated from source-backed determinations already published on MedicWatch.
Latest matching decisions
9 total
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr Ufunwen Osayi's fitness to practise is not currently impaired, but issued him a warning. Dr Osayi, a Consultant Histopathologist at Basildon Hospital, admitted serious failings in three coronial post-mortem examinations carried out in 2023, including not following professional guidelines, insufficient sampling, and giving incorrect causes of death. The tribunal accepted he had developed insight, undertaken extensive remediation and changed his practice, but a warning was needed to mark the seriousness of the past errors.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr Chi Leong's conduct toward a hospital colleague, Ms A, between October 2022 and April 2023 included persistent unwanted messages after she asked him to stop, and accessing her medical records without permission or legitimate reason. The tribunal decided this amounted to misconduct, but found his fitness to practise was not currently impaired because of his full insight, remorse and remediation. It issued him a formal warning, which will be published on the medical register, and placed no restriction on his registration.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr David Trennery's conduct towards a hospital patient in March 2021 amounted to serious misconduct, including visiting her when not clinically necessary, sharing personal details about his life and pursuing an improper emotional relationship. Allegations that touching was sexually motivated were not proved. The tribunal accepted his extensive remediation, full insight and low risk of repetition and decided his fitness to practise is not currently impaired, but issued a formal warning to mark the misconduct and uphold professional standards.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal found that Dr Firas Majeed's professional performance was unacceptable in assessing patients' conditions and clinical management following a GMC performance assessment. The tribunal found he had since remediated those concerns and his fitness to practise was not currently impaired. The tribunal imposed a formal warning, noting the deficiencies were sufficiently serious that repetition would likely result in a finding of impairment.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Jonathan Nigate. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal considered a conviction / caution case for Susannah Thoms. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Gagandeep Sachdeva. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Amit Goel. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.
Medical Practitioners Tribunal ServiceDoctor
Formally warned
The MPTS tribunal considered a misconduct case for Chitlapalli Sathyanath. It recorded the decision on impairment as not impaired and issued a warning. The source PDF contains the tribunal's published reasons, with any private material redacted where required.